Page created August 25, 2006
Sitting date:  June 11, 2006

 

I make some subtle adjustments to the positioning of the lights, creating more soft shadows.

  

  

kg02d0083sepbig.jpg

The first image using the subtly changed lighting, and it is a good start.  However, remember my posing nit, where I don't like when a model's limb is pointing at the camera lens?  Look at Kristin's right thigh -- it has all but disappeared, and I don't like how it looks like her knee is growing out of her hip.

Still, there's plenty here to be encouraging -- the soft shadows and the subtle highlights create a good feeling of depth to the image. 

 

(Still playing with the tall-narrow cropping).

There are pluses & minuses to this image.  The "limb pointing at camera" nit has been corrected.  However, Kristin has turned a bit towards the main light, which reduces those soft shadows that I worked to get.

kg02d0084sepbig.jpg

 

kg02d0088sepbig.jpg

The challenge of a sitting is to evaluate what you are seeing continuously and to make the necessary adjustments.  Take that image above -- I liked the pose, but I didn't like the position because the pose was open to the main light, which caused those subtle soft shadows to disappear.  How to fix it?  Simple.  I ask Kristin to give me the same pose's mirror image, with her facing away from the main light.  Here's the result.  What do you think? 

 

kg02d0090sepbig.jpg

 

Okay, I finally admit that I'm struggling with that main light placement.  I think I wanted more shadows, so I make additional changes to the lighting.  In the previous setup, the main light was twice as bright as the fill light, so the first thing I do is to make the adjustment so that the main & the fill light were equally bright.  Next, I moved the main light back some more.  I might have even switched from a large soft box to a medium-small soft box.

I like the results.

kg02d0095sepbig.jpg

 

kg02d0096sepbig.jpg

Much better!  This was the kind of light I had envisioned.  Also note her leg position -- with her right leg over her left, I don't have that "limb pointing at the camera" nit, but if her left leg was over her right, I would have had that nit. 

 

Like I said, I like asking my models to twist & stretch -- it makes their figures look great.

kg02d0098sepbig.jpg

 

kg02d0105sepbig.jpg

I like natural gestures.  Also note the relative positions of Kristin's elbows.  With the right elbow high, there is no "limb pointing at the camera" nit issues, but if her right elbow was low like her left, there would be that issue.  I just naturally select the poses that avoid that nit. 

 

Okay, this pose is a little on the "cheesecake" side, and her left thigh is pointing at the lens.  Still I like this image.

kg02d0109sepbig.jpg

 

 

Okay, throughout the time working with the studio lights, the digital camera was becoming unstable.  Soon after I made the exposure above, it just stopped working with the strobes.  My studio strobes are maybe 15 years old, and digital photography just wasn't a consideration when these lights were manufactured.  Now, digital photography is much more prevalent.  In fact, I've come to use my digital camera more & more, for a lot of reasons:

  • Nothing beats that instant gratification of seeing the image a second after it is exposed.
  • It is also helpful to be able to show the model some images, so that you can discuss what you are looking at & how you might want her to modify her posing.
  • With my eye problems, I have trouble focusing my film camera.  While I hate letting the digital camera make decisions for me, the auto-focus has proven helpful while I seek help for my occluded vein.
  • While film still provides much higher quality results, digital photography is quicker & cheaper.
  • I love the pivoting/swinging LCD screen, allowing me to compose images from unusual angles.  I just wish there were good DSLRs with such screens, but to date, there really isn't.

I had been using a hot-shoe-to-PC-Xsync adapter from the digital camera's manufacturer, it was now clear that it didn't protect the camera from the strobe's voltage.  While I sent the digital camera back to the manufacturer for repairs, I called the strobe light manufacturer, and they had a special voltage protector for adapting their lights to digital cameras.  So, hopefully, this adapter will protect the digital camera in the future, once it's back from being repaired.

Still it was frustrating.  Kristin had expressed an interest in doing some light bondage posing, something I haven't done in a while.  We even made arrangements for her boyfriend to be present & for him to act as a rigger.  We were saving the bondage stuff to the end, because we were concerned that any ropes would leave marks in Kristin's skin.

But the digital camera simply didn't last long enough, and my eye was not in good enough shape to focus the film camera.  So, even though we were only 2/3rds of the way through our time, I just had to give up & send them home.  (For the record, I paid Kristin for the full session -- I figure it wasn't her fault that my equipment failed, and she made the commitment to travel all the way here in the expectation of being paid.)

As I write this, it's roughly two months after this sitting's date.  The camera has been repaired & appears to be working well, but I can't say that I trust it.  My eye is much better, and although focusing is a bit of a challenge, I can do it.  So, hopefully, I'll be able to pick up the pace shortly.  (In fact, as I write this, I had another sitting about a week ago, and another one scheduled in about a week.)

 

(Remember -- feedback is always appreciated) 

All images (c) 2006 Looknsee Photography

Kristin #2 Out Takes

Over 60 more images from this sitting are available in the Out Takes Galleries, which are available to those who have made a donation to the upkeep of this web site.  See this FAQ question for more details.

Hit Counter